Indian Trust: Cobell v. Norton Home Privacy Policy
Site Map Contact Saturday, July 17 2004
 
Email Signup
Enter your email address below to receive Indian Trust updates by email.

News Articles
 Wednesday October 17, 2001
 Norton blasted on trust fund
Indianz.com
 
The government's three-year-old plan to fix the broken trust fund "may not be capable of repair" because Secretary of Interior Gale Norton has failed to take responsibility, a court monitor charged in a report highly critical of the Bush administration on Tuesday.

Although numerous management problems existed before Norton took office nine months ago, they have "increased in severity" under her watch, said Joseph S. Kieffer III. Instead of supporting her top trust fund official Tom Slonaker, she and senior aides have rejected his advice and subjected him to "questioning," thereby undermining his authority throughout the department, he added.

And even though Norton has taken credit for taking steps to "streamline" trust reform, these efforts are inadequate, continued Kieffer. A new trust fund office, a special secretarial order and a $1 million effort to have an outside management consulting firm assess the government's capabilities are destined to fail because she has not addressed key reform issues that have been made evident to her in recent months, he has concluded. "There is no one in charge of trust reform operations," wrote Kieffer in the 30-page report. "There is no one who knows what is necessary or how to correct trust reform management, communications, and systems problems to bring about successful trust reform."

Kieffer's caustic criticism comes after the Interior turned in its latest trust fund status report. Without approval from a federal judge, the government submitted it a month late, citing a need to clear up concerns raised by Slonaker, a Clinton appointee retained by the Bush administration to oversee the trust accounts of an estimated 300,000 American Indians throughout the country.

But, according to Kieffer and other court documents, Norton did little -- if anything at all -- to respond to Slonaker's reservations. Instead, her lawyers, Solicitor Bill Myers and senior management did all they could to avoid taking responsibility, said Kieffer. The result, wrote Kieffer, was that Norton "verified an untruthful, inaccurate, and incomplete" status report covering the months of May, June and July. "No senior DOI official would touch that report with a ten-foot pole," he added.

Already having cited Norton and a number of other officials in their court filings, a lawyer for the plaintiffs in the Cobell v. Norton lawsuit said they would seek sanctions against government attorneys and senior management for "aiding and perpetrating a fraud on the court."

In particular, said Dennis Gingold, government attorneys have engaged in "unethical" conduct worthy of fines and potential disbarment. "That is about as severe misconduct that a[n] . . . attorney can ever engage in," he said. The Interior would not comment specifically on Kieffer's report, only saying Norton would respond to the federal court overseeing the Cobell lawsuit within 10 days. Special Trustee Slonaker, through an aide, declined to comment. Myers, though his office, deferred to the Interior.

"It is a priority of the department to move the Indian trust accounting system into the 21st century and to identify and implement a method to make a historical accounting that will be funded by the Congress and is acceptable to the court," said spokesperson Nedra Darling. Congress has already spent $614 million to fix the broken trust. A joint House-Senate committee last week approved approximately $150 million for fiscal year 2002 to fund efforts to correct more than 100 years of
mismanagement. The bill aways final action by Congress, which is expected this week.

The government says the Individual Indian Money (IIM) accounts represent about $500 million in trust assets. But the government cannot guarantee the accuracy of any account despite being charged by law to do so.
 
for more information: click here
 « prev article next article » 
 
« October » « 2001 »
date article link
10/31/01 Judge ready to hold Norton in contempt [ view ]
10/31/01 Interior promises trust fund defense [ view ]
10/31/01 Judge Warns He May Hold Norton, Others in Contempt
Stewardship of Indian Funds, Court Order at Issue
[ view ]
10/31/01 'Contemptuous' Norton irks judge
Discipline possible in Indian trust case
[ view ]
10/30/01 Trust fund defense team scrapped [ view ]
10/30/01 Judge scolds government attorneys for mishandling Indian lawsuit. [ view ]
10/22/01 Indians Want Receiver for Trust Fund
Contempt Charges Sought for Officials
[ view ]
10/21/01 Indian trust fund in trouble [ view ]
10/21/01 Indians' attorney wants Norton jailed [ view ]
10/18/01 The New Smallpox, Part II [ view ]
10/17/01 Norton blasted on trust fund [ view ]
10/17/01 Norton faulted on Indian trusts [ view ]
10/16/01 Top Interior Department attorney pressured managers to support misleading report [ view ]
10/11/01 Trust fund progress 'stretches credibility' [ view ]
10/10/01 The Case of the Missing Report [ view ]
10/10/01 Trust fund fix at 'great risk' of failure [ view ]
10/10/01 Memo: Solicitor's order was 'intimidating' [ view ]
10/02/01 Norton appears closer to citation for contempt [ view ]
10/01/01 Court-appointed investigator recommends judge hold Norton in contempt [ view ]
 « September | November » « 2000 | 2002 » 
Home | Privacy Policy | Site Map
 
Copyright ©2004 Blackfeet Reservation Development Fund, Inc. All rights reserved.
 
Developed by www.gslsolutions.com.